data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e284f/e284f2c7653043ebcffb922ef189b8815d361292" alt="Base Isolation and Damage Resistant Technologies for Improved Seismic Performance of Buildings"
Base Isolation and Damage Resistant Technologies for Improved Seismic Performance of Buildings
Document information
Author | Andrew H. Buchanan |
School | University of Canterbury |
Major | Engineering |
Place | Christchurch, New Zealand |
Document type | report |
Language | English |
Format | |
Size | 7.20 MB |
Summary
I.Introduction
The document explains why modern buildings were severely damaged in the Christchurch earthquakes. The primary reason is that current design methods rely on some damage to protect the structures. Additionally, the ground shaking in Christchurch on February 22 was significantly stronger than the shaking used to design modern buildings.
1. Modern performance based design concepts
The Introduction provides an overview of modern performance-based design concepts and their relevance to damage-resistant structures. It highlights the importance of specifying and documenting these concepts in design standards such as NZS 1170 Part 5, and suggests the need for an introductory document to facilitate their understanding and implementation. The text emphasizes the potential of displacement-oriented design philosophies to reduce structural and non-structural damage in future earthquakes and advocates for providing practitioners with an open choice between Displacement-Based and Force-Based design methods, provided that seismic performance and building displacements are adequately addressed.
II.Ductile and Damage Resistant Structures
Ductile structures can withstand several cycles of severe loading, with materials stressed in the inelastic range without losing structural integrity. Damage-resistant structures can absorb energy in other structural parts, allowing the building to rock back and forth in a significant earthquake and return to an undamaged position after the shaking.
III.Base Isolation
Base isolation reduces damage in a significant earthquake by reducing the building's response by partially isolating it from the ground shaking. Lead-rubber bearings are placed under the building, which allows an economical building to be built on an expensive foundation.
1. Base Isolation
Base isolation is a structural technique used to protect buildings from earthquakes by placing them on a layer of flexible material that absorbs and dissipates energy from seismic waves. This helps to reduce the amount of shaking that is transmitted to the building, making it less likely to be damaged or destroyed. Base isolation has been successfully used on numerous buildings in New Zealand and around the world, including the Christchurch Women's Hospital and the Te Papa Museum in Wellington.
Lead-rubber bearings are a common type of base isolation device. These bearings are made of a rubber core sandwiched between two steel plates. The rubber core is designed to deform in response to seismic waves, which dissipates energy and reduces the amount of shaking that is transmitted to the building. Lead-rubber bearings are also self-centering, which means that they will return the building to its original position after an earthquake.
IV.Performance Based Seismic Engineering PBSE
PBSE establishes expected or desired performance levels coupled with levels of seismic hazard. Performance levels indicate the maximum acceptable extent of damage under a given level of seismic ground motion, representing losses and repair costs due to both structural and non-structural damage.
1. Introduction
The document discusses the reasons behind the excessive damage to modern buildings in the Christchurch earthquakes. It highlights the shortcomings of the current design methods and the need for performance-based seismic engineering (PBSE) to ensure that future buildings are more resistant to earthquakes.
2. Damage Resistant Structures
The document explores various damage-resistant structures, including ductile structures, base-isolated structures, and steel structures with supplemental damping devices. It explains how these structures can absorb and dissipate seismic energy, reducing damage during earthquakes.
3. Performance Based Seismic Engineering PBSE
PBSE is introduced as a design philosophy that links expected or desired performance levels with levels of seismic hazard. It aims to ensure that buildings perform as intended under different earthquake scenarios, minimizing damage and protecting occupants and contents.
4. Floors and Other Structural Components
The document emphasizes the importance of protecting floors and other structural components from damage. It discusses various techniques for avoiding damage to floors, such as using precast concrete frames and hollow core floor units, and ensuring proper diaphragm action.
5. Innovative Structural Systems
The document presents several innovative structural systems that have been developed to improve seismic performance. These systems include precast concrete frames with post-tensioned connections, steel structures with sliding hinge joints, and rocking walls with replaceable fuses.
6. Conclusion
The document concludes by emphasizing the need for a shift towards displacement-oriented design philosophies in PBSE. It advocates for the adoption of new innovative design methods that prioritize reducing structural and non-structural damage in future earthquakes.
V.damage resistant design
Defines damage-resistant design as minimizing damage compared to existing construction during a design-level earthquake. Structures satisfying this criterion should also be available for occupancy soon after a very large earthquake.
Number 1 Damage resistant design
It is not possible to design and build structures that are damage-resistant under all earthquakes, so the term should be used with care. In the context of this document, it simply means that there should be less damage than in existing construction during design level earthquake excitation. A structure which satisfies this criteria should also be available for occupation soon after the very large shaking associated with the Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) event.
VI.Strengthening Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls
To prevent severe damage to reinforced concrete structural walls, it is recommended to provide more confinement in critical regions, avoid using thin structural concrete walls, properly anchor vertical bars in walls, and use laps in reinforcing bars.
VII.Pounding and Ground Motion Effects
To prevent pounding between adjacent buildings, it is essential to consider the effects of ground motion. This can be achieved by providing separation between buildings, using energy-absorbing devices, or introducing yielding mechanisms.
1. Introduction
This document is about damage resistant structures in New Zealand after the earthquake. Damage resistant structures can be designed to absorb energy in other parts of the structure, so that the building rocks back and forth in a major earthquake, returning to an undamaged position after the shaking. This combines ductility to reduce the design forces with little or no residual damage.
2. Base Isolation Will Reduce Damage in a Major Earthquake
Base isolation will reduce damage in a major earthquake, by reducing the response of the building by partially isolating it from the shaking ground. This is done by placing the building on base-isolation units such as the lead-rubber bearings under Christchurch Women’s Hospital, also used at Te Papa, and Parliament Buildings in Wellington.
3. Structural Control Devices Will Reduce Damage
Structural control devices will reduce damage in a major earthquake, by partially isolating the structure from the shaking ground. This is done by placing the building on structural control devices such as the viscoelastic dampers used in the Sky Tower in Auckland.
4. Hybrid Systems Will Combine the Benefits of Multiple Techniques
Hybrid systems will combine the benefits of multiple techniques to reduce damage in a major earthquake. For example, a building could be designed with a base isolation system to reduce the overall response of the building, and with structural control devices to further reduce the damage to the structure.
5. Conclusion
There are a number of different ways to reduce damage to buildings in a major earthquake. The most effective approach will depend on the specific building and site conditions. However, all of these techniques can be used to improve the seismic performance of buildings and to reduce the risk of damage.
VIII.Damage Resistant Technologies
Presents various technologies and techniques used to create damage-resistant structures, including energy dissipation devices, rocking connections, and post-tensioned connections.
1. Damage Resistant Technologies
Damage-resistant structures can also be designed to absorb energy in other parts of the structure, so that the building rocks back and forth in a major earthquake, returning to an undamaged position after the shaking. This combines ductility to reduce the design forces with little or no residual damage. New Zealand engineers are contributing to international developments in this field, including the recently completed reinforced concrete Endoscopy building at Southern Cross Hospital in Christchurch, TePuni Village steel building at Victoria University in Wellington, and the new NMIT timber building in Nelson. Experimental research at the University of Canterbury has supported these developments, which will allow new damage-resistant buildings at no more cost than conventional building designs.
2. Base Isolation
Base isolation will reduce damage in a major earthquake, by reducing the response of the building by partially isolating it from the shaking ground. This is done by placing the building on base-isolation units such as the lead-rubber bearings under Christchurch Women’s Hospital, also used at Te Papa, and Parliament Buildings in Wellington. These devices allow an economical building to be built on an expensive foundation, with the total cost being only a little more than conventional design.
3. Structural Systems
structural systems. Ductile structures are able to withstand several cycles of severe loading, with materials stressed in the inelastic range, without losing structural integrity. This design philosophy, referred to as ‚capacity design‛, was developed in the 1960s and 1970s by Professors Bob Park and Tom Paulay at the University of Canterbury.